Take a particularly provocative and grandstanding Israeli government and shift its focus from Hamas and Gaza to Jerusalem and you have a most explosive recipe. That potion is being stirred now, and the results could shake up the status quo in a way that we have only seen a few times in Israel’s history. Read more at LobeLog
Posts Tagged ‘Jordan’
Posted in Jerusalem, tagged Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, al-Aqsa, al-Quds, ARab League, East Jerusalem, Hamas, Haram al-Sharif, Hashemite, ISIS, Jerusalem, Jerusalem light rail attack, Jordan, Jordan-Israel Peace Treaty, King Abdullah, Muslim Brotherhood, Netanyahu, Refugees, Religious Zionism, Temple Mount, Yehuda Glick, Zionism on November 7, 2014 | Leave a Comment »
Posted in Uncategorized, United States, US-Israel Lobby, tagged AIPAC, Barack Obama, BDS, Bernie Sanders, Black September, campaign financing, Chuck Hagel, Code Pink, Cold War, Cory Booker, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Egypt, Elizabeth Warren, Gaza, Gaza Under Attack, George W. Bush, Golda Meir, Harry S. Truman, Henry Kissinger, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Criminal Court, Israel Lobby, Israel Nuclear weapons, Israeli nuclear program, Jewish Voice for Peace, John Foster Dulles, John Mearsheimer, Jordan, Kurds, Lyndon B. Johnson, Nasser, national security council, Noam Chomsky, Occupation, Phantom Jets, Richard Nixon, Settlements, Sheldon Adelson, Soviet Union, Stephen Walt, Syria, United Nations, US Aid to Israel, US Foreign Policy, US geo-strategy, US National interests, West Bank, Yitzhak Rabin, Zionism on October 15, 2014 | Leave a Comment »
During the summertime war in Gaza, the two most progressive members of the US Senate stirred up controversy among their backers with expressions of uncritical support for Israel. At a town hall meeting, Bernie Sanders of Vermont, the lone Senate independent, responded to a questioner that Israel had “overreacted” with its 52-day bombardment and ground incursion, but then proceeded to justify Israel’s actions with the usual pro-Israel talking points about “missiles fired from populated areas” and “sophisticated tunnels.” An audience member began to shout objections, to which Sanders said, “Shut up.”
Elizabeth Warren, the Democrat from Massachusetts, went further in her defense of Israel at a meeting with constituents on Cape Cod. She said it was right for the United States to send $225 million in aid to Israel, a “democracy controlled by the rule of law,” as the bombing continued. She ventured no criticism at all of the extensive damage to civilian lives and livelihoods in Gaza. When another constituent suggested that future US aid be conditioned on Israel halting settlement construction in the West Bank, Warren replied, “I think there’s a question of whether we should go that far.” Read more at the Middle East Research and Information Project
Posted in Peace Plans, tagged 1991 Gulf War, ARab League, Bi-nationalism, Cold War, democracy, intifada, Israel, Jews, Jordan, Nationalism, Occupied Territories, Oslo Accords, Palestine, Palestinians, PLO, Secular, West Bank, Yasir Arafat, Zionism on October 11, 2013 | Leave a Comment »
In the last of three pieces, starting with an article at LobeLog earlier this week and one at this site yesterday, I look at the need for advocacy for various one-state formulations to be part of the discourse around resolving the Israel-Palestine conflict. I argue that, even for two-staters, there is an absolute need to broaden the discussion, to get to a better idea than the failed Oslo one, but that this won’t be possible unless some leadership, probably Palestinian though it could be Israeli too, is willing to advocate a one-state solution. That’s what is missing now, and what needs to emerge and just might be doing so. Check it out in Souciant this week.
Posted in Egypt, tagged AKP, al-Sisi, Anwar Sadat, Arab Spring, Catherine Ashton, Coup, Egypt, Egyptian Coup, Egyption Revolution, Fawaz Gerges, Gamal Abdel Nasser, Gaza, Hamas, Hosni Mubarak, Jordan, June 30, Libya, Mohammed Morsi, Muslim Brotherhood, Political Islam, SCAF, Tunisia, Turkey on July 31, 2013 | Leave a Comment »
This article originally appeared at LobeLog.
It’s time to ask some tough questions about US policy regarding Egypt. The most pressing being what that policy is, exactly?
I agreed with the easily assailable decision by the Obama administration to refrain from labeling the ouster of Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi a coup. It still is my belief that doing so might be consistent with US law, but would not be helpful to Egypt. Instead of taking funding away from the military which, since it now directly controls the Egyptian till, would simply divert the lost funds from other places (causing even more distress to an already reeling Egyptian economy) it would be better to use the aid as leverage to push the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) toward an inclusive political process that would include drafting a broadly acceptable constitution and, with all due speed, re-installing a duly elected civilian government. (more…)
Posted in Barack Obama, Bibi Netanyahu, Turkey, tagged Avigdor Lieberman, Benjamin Netanyahu, Danny Ayalon, Egypt, Erdogan, Flotilla, Hamas, Jordan, Mavi Marmara, Moshe Ya'alon, Muslim Brotherhood, Syria, Turkey on March 23, 2013 | Leave a Comment »
A reader at LobeLog asked how I thought Netanyahu’s surprising and long-belated apology to Turkey over the Mavi Marmara killings fit in with my analysis of Obama’s speeches in Jerusalem and Ramallah. I thought my readers here would be interested in my response, so I reprint it below.
I think it fits in perfectly. What Obama set out to do, in my view, was to reset his foreign policy priorities, given not only the pivot to Asia, but also the domestic political
realities that severely limit his options in dealing with Israel (i.e. AIPAC et al). He’s essentially trying to move the conflict out of the way.
It may well be that events, maybe in Syria, possibly even in Egypt or Jordan, will change the status quo by drawing Israel in and that may hamper the move to lessen US involvement in all of this. But for now, Obama will do what he must as dictated by US politics but I think little if anything more, and that was his message to the Israeli public.
To Bibi, I think he handed that perspective as a gift, or more precisely a payoff. Basically, he said I’m not going to push you the negotiating table, but you’re going to pay me back for that by making this issue less of a thorn in my side. I think the rapprochement with Turkey is the centerpiece of that, because while the split between those two US allies has not always been in the news, it is a central concern for US diplomats. This makes matters simpler.
I think Obama was also hoping that Bibi would agree to turn the heat back down on the Iran issue and let Obama take the lead. Such a thing would probably be wise for Israel, even from their point of view, because Obama’s own rhetoric on Iran has hardly been mollifying. But I think that was an area where Bibi was much less forthcoming. He knows his new defense minister prefers the US hit Iran rather than Israel, but also that he very much believes that the US should be pressured to do so–Ya’alon does not seem to share the assessment of his military and intelligence leaders on Iran, which is pretty much identical to the US’. (more…)
Posted in United States, tagged Barack Obama, Benjamin Netanyahu, Daniel Levy, Iran, Joel Beinin, Jordan, King Abdullah II, Mahmoud Abbas, Mark Perry, Salam Fayyad, Shimon Peres, Syria, Two-state solution on March 19, 2013 | Leave a Comment »
Posted in Israel, tagged Avigdor Lieberman, Benjamin Netanyahu, East Jerusalem, Ehud Barak, Ehud Olmert, Gaza, Habayit Hayehudi, HaTnuah, Iran, Isaac Herzog, Israel, Jordan, Likud, Meretz, Naftali Bennett, Palestine, Shelly Yachimovich, Syria, Tzipi Livini, West Bank, Yair Lapid, Yesh Atid, Yisrael Beitenu, Yom Kippur War on March 1, 2013 | Leave a Comment »
Israel may not have a government, but the election settled one thing: both the governing coalition and the opposition will be led by and mostly composed of parties who range from indifference to ending the occupation to outright hostility to the very suggestion. I explore this in Souciant this week.