In the last of three pieces, starting with an article at LobeLog earlier this week and one at this site yesterday, I look at the need for advocacy for various one-state formulations to be part of the discourse around resolving the Israel-Palestine conflict. I argue that, even for two-staters, there is an absolute need to broaden the discussion, to get to a better idea than the failed Oslo one, but that this won’t be possible unless some leadership, probably Palestinian though it could be Israeli too, is willing to advocate a one-state solution. That’s what is missing now, and what needs to emerge and just might be doing so. Check it out in Souciant this week.
Posts Tagged ‘Palestinians’
Posted in Peace Plans, tagged 1991 Gulf War, ARab League, Bi-nationalism, Cold War, democracy, intifada, Israel, Jews, Jordan, Nationalism, Occupied Territories, Oslo Accords, Palestine, Palestinians, PLO, Secular, West Bank, Yasir Arafat, Zionism on October 11, 2013 | Leave a Comment »
Posted in Israel, tagged Ahad Ha'am, Avigdor Lieberman, David Ben-Gurion, Ha'aretz, Israel, Israeli Arabs, Jews, Judah magnes, Martin Buber, Multiculturalism, Naftali Bennett, Natzrat Ilit, Nazareth, Palestinians, Racism, Shimon Gafsou, Theodor Herzl, Upper Nazareth, Zionism on August 9, 2013 | Leave a Comment »
The mayor of Upper Nazareth, Shimon Gafsou, is campaigning for re-election on an openly racist platform, even by the standards set by the likes of Avigdor Lieberman and Naftali Bennett. His openly racist statements bring out some uncomfortable but crucial truths about Israel and why a resolution of the conflict with the Palestinians has been so hard to reach for. I explore this week in Souciant.
Posted in United States, US-Israel Lobby, tagged AIPAC, Camp David, Dennis Ross, Israel, Israel Lobby, Israel-Palestine Talks, Martin Indyk, Oslo Peace Process, Palestinians, WINEP on July 21, 2013 | 1 Comment »
This piece originally appeared at LobeLog.
Martin Indyk is about to be named the US representative for the resuscitated Israel-Palestinian talks, according to a report from Israel’s Channel 2. (Though it seems Channel 2′s Ehud Yaari was not first with the news. That was actually the inestimable Laura Rozen at al-Monitor)
This says a great deal about the US role in the “peace process” and, indeed, the conflict in general. Indyk was the key force in founding the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), which is, in essence, the think tank of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). In fact, Indyk went from working for AIPAC to working for them as WINEP’s first Executive Director in 1985.
He went on to be Bill Clinton’s special assistant for the Middle East and senior director of Near East and South Asian Affairs at the National Security Council. His government service culminated in appointments as US Ambassador to Israel from April 1995 to September 1997 and again from January 2000 to July 2001. Indyk was as central as any figure to the construction — and failures — of the Oslo process, the Camp David II summit in 2000 and the following years of downward spiral. (more…)