• Home
  • About Mitchell Plitnick
  • Contact Mitchell
  • Guidelines for comments
  • My Resume

Rethinking Foreign Policy

Political Analysis by Mitchell Plitnick

« Livni: I Am Against International Law In Particular
Made in USA Tear Gas Used In Egypt–What About Israel? »

Does Everybody Know What Everybody Knows?

January 25, 2011 by Mitchell Plitnick

The following piece was originally published at The Palestine Note

I wrote yesterday about a particular instance where I felt the Guardian (UK) had distorted and enflamed the content of one of the increasingly notorious Palestine Papers. Today, fellow blogger Bernard Avishai takes it a step further.

Avishai calls the Guardian’s coverage “outrageous” and openly wonders if “…the Guardian actually like(s) this conflict?” I think Bernie is somewhat overstating his case, but his essential point is valid.

Avishai points out that “Any prospective agreement would be a compromise,” and he’s right. For the most part, the really explosive stuff in the Palestine Papers, at least in terms of the Palestinian Authority, is the stuff of pragmatism and compromise.

Ceding Jewish areas in East Jerusalem? Perfectly consistent with the Clinton Parameters. Only a token return of refugees? This has long been understood to be at the very heart of the two-state solution, and precisely the reason so many Right of Return activists are also one-staters. Land swaps to minimize the number of settlers Israel would have to move? Again, this is a very familiar part of the discourse.

Ron Kampeas at the Jewish Telegraphic Agency sees something different in the Papers. As he puts it, “If anything, the documents shatter the illusion that there is a bottom-line consensus about certain settlements being annexed to Israel in a final-status agreement. Many groups refer to these as the “everybody knows” settlements, such as Maaleh Edumim and Efrat, both near Jerusalem.”

I think Kampeas comes very close to the mark as to the real significance of the Palestine Papers. Sure, those of us on the left see in it the confirmation of American bias toward Israel and Israeli reluctance to compromise.  But then why is it that the Americans and Israelis seem not in the least concerned about the revelations, while the PA is in a panic?

See, it’s actually not, as Avishai might be implying, sensationalistic reporting by the Guardian or Al Jazeera. It’s Kampeas’ “everybody knows” items.

The peace process has proceeded, from the very beginning, with an ever-widening disconnect from the Palestinian people. It’s a tone that was set when the Oslo Accords were first being worked out, and Yasir Arafat worked to ensure that the key negotiators were all his people who had shared his exile in Tunisia. The local leadership from the Palestinian Territories (which, ironically, included Saeb Erekat at the time) was relegated to secondary status at best.

And so it has continued for all of these years. Among the Palestinian people there simply hasn’t been the open, public discourse that has happened in Israel. Arafat, in the years before his death, was at least much more connected to the people than his successors. This is why he rejected the Camp David offer and gave only a lukewarm response to the Clinton Parameters. He was unable to counter-offer because, while he knew that was before him was not acceptable to the people, he really didn’t know what would be. He needed to facilitate a public discussion on the “tough compromises” that would be needed, but he feared doing this and never did so before his death.

This has gotten much worse under Mahmoud Abbas, because Arafat was really alone among the “Tunis” crowd, as they were sometimes called, in having any real understanding of the feeling of the Palestinian street. And, despite the fact that the Israelis cynically capitalized on this very weakness, one has to acknowledge that they were aware that it was there and it was thus not unreasonable for them to question the Palestinian leadership’s ability to deliver on the sorts of deals that were under discussion.

When a Palestinian says she or he supports a two-state solution, what does that mean? Does that person think it ok for Israel to keep Gilo, the settlement outside of Jerusalem and right near Bethlehem? Do they accept land swaps at all? Do they accept only a token return of refugees, and that the Right of Return, which is widely viewed as an individual right, be essentially forfeited? Do they accept sharing Jerusalem and a compromise on the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount? Does the majority of Palestinians still support a two-state solution at all?

We can look at polls, but if the 2006 Palestinian elections proved anything it is that polls of Palestinians are far from definitive. I can say from personal experience that I’ve heard all sorts of answers to the questions above, from Palestinians in the Territories and the Diaspora, from the relatively well-to-do and the poorest refugees, from the religious and the secular, from those in relative positions of power and the common worker.

The point is, the Palestinian negotiators are working within what they see as the “pragmatic framework.” That means getting whatever they can from the Israelis and Americans within the bounds of what the Arab League will support. In more recent years they’ve also had to balance what Hamas might be able to capitalize on to some degree.

But some of these things that “everybody knows” have always seemed questionable to me and many others who approach this question with a more critical eye. Because it was always “everybody knows” that:

  • Israel will keep Ariel and Ma’ale Adumim
  • The Palestinians will accept a token return of refugees
  • Palestinians will accept a de-militarized state with Israeli rights to their airspace
  • Palestinians will accept some Jordanian influence over their politics as well as agree to exclude Hamas and similar groups from the political process
  • Palestinians may not like these things, but they can be made to accept them.

Some of these are more common than others, but I’ve heard them all and more.

Fundamentally, this is what is missing and what puts the PA in so much more peril because of the revelations in the Papers. It is the Palestinian discussion, the clear and apparent discourse that gets expressed through various channels: political debate and elections, market trends, a free media. Sure, there are vocal activists in Palestine and in the Palestinian diaspora, but it is no more than a cacophony of ideas and opinions. It does not guide the political leaders.

And, to be sure, political leaders everywhere, certainly including Israel and the United States, manipulate that public opinion in an attempt to garner support for their preferred course. But still, Ariel Sharon knew he had enough public support to pull out of Gaza, and the right failed to bring him down in response. Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Olmert, Ehud Barak, and, yes, Yitzhak Rabin all also knew they had to get support for their policies as well. They could not simply act on their personal judgments.

That is what the Palestine Papers have exposed more than anything else. Bernie Avishai is correct when he says the Guardian has been overly bombastic, but they’re sensationalizing something real. And that something is that Palestinians are finally finding ways to weigh in on what “everybody knows.” This is a desperately needed process if there is ever to be an agreement, on whatever parameters, that will be accepted by both Israelis and Palestinians. Right now, we only have the say-so of the former and that cannot possibly lead to resolution.


Advertisements

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Free speech, Mahmoud Abbas, Palestine Papers, Peace Plans | Tagged Abbas, democracy, human rights, Jerusalem, Justice, Occupation, Palestine, Palestinian Authority, Palestinians, Settlements, Two-state solution, West Bank | 15 Comments

15 Responses

  1. on January 25, 2011 at 9:36 pm Tweets that mention Does Everybody Know What Everybody Knows? « The Third Way: Finding Balance In Mideast Analysis -- Topsy.com

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mitchell Plitnick, Robert Meintzer and Mitchell Plitnick, Mitchell Plitnick. Mitchell Plitnick said: Does Everybody Know What Everybody Knows? http://goo.gl/fb/ns2WL […]


  2. on January 28, 2011 at 4:30 pm Arab Democracy and Israel: They Can be Compatible - Blog Post

    […] process" as a sham, with the Palestinian Authority offering concessions that would probably not have been acceptable to most Palestinians, Israel downplaying and even ignoring many of those same massive concessions and the United States […]


  3. on January 28, 2011 at 4:39 pm Arab Democracy and Israel: They Can be Compatible « The Third Way: Finding Balance In Mideast Analysis

    […] process” as a sham, with the Palestinian Authority offering concessions that would probably not have been acceptable to most Palestinians, Israel downplaying and even ignoring many of those same massive concessions and the United States […]


  4. on February 16, 2011 at 11:10 am Why Is This Veto Not Like All Other Vetoes? « The Third Way: Finding Balance In Mideast Analysis

    […] The formula of bilateral negotiations as the only path to a solution to this conflict has been exposed by the Palestine Papers for the sham it has been for years. The massive concessions the Palestinians offered was met with the chirping of crickets by the Olmert government and Netanyahu then wanted to start the whole negotiation from scratch. When revealed, these facts, already well-known in policy and advocacy circles, revealed not only Israeli intransigence but also that the terms the Palestinian negotiators (now out of work) were not acceptable to most Palestinians. […]


  5. on January 11, 2012 at 3:25 am The Oslo Syndrome | Souciant

    […] the notion that “everyone knows” the sort of land swaps that would be necessary, which Alpher references elsewhere in his […]


  6. on December 7, 2012 at 7:18 am The Two-State Scam | Souciant

    […] Ma’ale Adumim be connected to Israel? And Ma’ale Adumim is one of the settlement blocs that “everybody knows” would be part of Israel in any final status […]


  7. on January 30, 2013 at 6:15 am The Occupation Won | Souciant

    […] his “centrist” image because Ariel is one of the famed “three settlement blocs” that are generally understood in Israel as being the territory Israel will keep in any agreement. The Palestinians may not agree, […]


  8. on September 18, 2013 at 2:04 pm Oslo At 20: A Failed Process « LobeLog.com

    […] After twenty years of futility, more and more people are coming around to the idea that the Oslo process has failed and that the basis of Israeli-Palestinian conflict resolution needs to be re-thought. Funny, there are those of us who have been saying that for years now. […]


  9. on September 18, 2013 at 2:35 pm Oslo At 20: A Failed Process | IPS Writers in the Blogosphere

    […] After twenty years of futility, more and more people are coming around to the idea that the Oslo process has failed and that the basis of Israeli-Palestinian conflict resolution needs to be re-thought. Funny, there are those of us who have been saying that for years now. […]


  10. on November 21, 2013 at 1:12 pm What Obama can do in Israel-Palestine « LobeLog.com

    […] then, Israel’s excuse for building in those settlements has been based on the argument that “everyone knows” they are going to remain in Israeli hands anyway. Again, the text of Bush’s […]


  11. on October 12, 2014 at 3:50 pm The Palestinian Refugee Issue is Not Going to Resolve Itself | IPS Writers in the Blogosphere

    […] the matter of the Palestinian refugees came up on the other hand, there was a visible disconnect between the sentiments among the Palestinians, both in and outside the Occupied Territories, and […]


  12. on January 21, 2015 at 12:59 pm Arab Democracy and Israel: They Can be Compatible | Partners for Progressive Israel

    […] process” as a sham, with the Palestinian Authority offering concessions that would probably not have been acceptable to most Palestinians, Israel downplaying and even ignoring many of those same massive concessions and the United States […]


  13. on April 14, 2015 at 11:08 pm The Palestinian Refugee Issue is Not Going to Resolve Itself « LobeLog

    […] the matter of the Palestinian refugees came up on the other hand, there was a visible disconnect between the sentiments among the Palestinians, both in and outside the Occupied Territories, and […]


  14. on May 20, 2015 at 6:46 am Elliott Abrams’ Shell Game on Settlements « LobeLog

    […] of the West Bank—and in key areas, especially around Jerusalem—that if we go with the “everybody knows” argument (i.e. that there is a basic understanding that Israel will keep these blocs in an […]


  15. on April 5, 2018 at 11:17 am Gaza: Don’t Look Away – LobeLog

    […] in the West Bank and East Jerusalem and by Israeli and US attitudes and policies—there was never any such notion on the right of return. It has long been a matter that certain Palestinian leaders have winked at […]



Comments are closed.

  • Feedburner

    Subscribe to The Third Way: Finding Balance In Mideast Analysis by Email

  • Speaker

    Do you need an expert speaker on Israel-Palestine, the history of the conflict, the US-Israel relationship, the different sectors of the peace movement, and many other topics related to Israel-Palestine?

    Use the contact form here to contact me to speak to your group, on your panel or at your event.

  • Follow me on Twitter

    My Tweets
  • Blogs

    • +972 Magazine
    • Bernard Avishai Dot Com
    • Dove’s Eye View
    • Emily L. Hauser – In My Head
    • Juan Cole: Informed Comment
    • Leonard Fein: The Conversation
    • Muzzlewatch
    • Realistic Dove
    • Realistic Peace In Israel-Palestine (Moshe Yaroni)
    • South Jerusalem
    • The Magnes Zionist
    • Wish You Orwell–The Decline and Fall of the Israeli Democracy
  • Favorite Sites

    • Alliance for Middle East Peace
    • Ameinu
    • Americans for Peace Now
    • B’Tselem
    • Churches for Middle East Peace
    • Combatants For Peace
    • Foundation for Middle East Peace
    • Gush Shalom
    • Hamoked
    • J Street
    • Jewish Voice for Peace
    • New Israel Fund
    • Partners for Progressive Israel
    • Rabbis for Human Rights
    • Ray Hanania’s Home Page
    • T'Ruah: The Rabbinic Call for Human Rights
    • Uri Avnery’s news pages
    • Yesh Din
  • News Sources

    • Al-Ahram Weekly
    • Ha’aretz
    • Jewish Telegraphic Agency
    • Lobe Log
    • Ma’an News Agency
    • The Forward
    • Ynet
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.com
  • Recent Posts

    • Radio Appearances Discussing Rep. Ilhan Omar
    • Ilhan Omar, AIPAC, And Denial
    • The Palestine Problem
    • Connecting Palestinian Rights To U.S. Civil Rights
    • Drama Starts Early In Israeli Elections
  • January 2011
    M T W T F S S
    « Dec   Feb »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
  • Advertisements

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: