In the wake of the United States’ elections, the waning weeks of 2016 are being defined by despair for progressives. That despair is at its thickest when considering the prospects for ending the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.
The questions that are troubling everyone concerned with resolving the conflict are existential: Is there any possibility of a Palestinian state anymore? How can we even keep hoping in the aftermath of the election in the United States? Is there any path forward? Yet, as troubling as the current situation is, hope and opportunity remain. Read more at The Times of Israel
Read Full Post »
Posted in Israel, Palestine, Quartet, Two-State Solution, tagged 1967 borders, Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel, Israeli Settlements, Jerusalem, Obama administration, Palestine, Palestinian Refugees, Quartet, Two-state solution, United Nations on May 2, 2016 |
Leave a Comment »
The idea that “direct, bilateral negotiations are the only viable path to achieve an enduring peace,” is repeated often in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The truth of it is obvious; any
lasting agreement will require the full buy-in from both Israelis and Palestinians, and it is unlikely that an imposed settlement of the conflict would hold. The frequency with which this axiom is repeated suggests that an imposition of an agreement by outside actors such as the United Nations, the European Union or even the United States is a real possibility. In fact, virtually no one seriously suggests that an agreement simply be imposed on Israelis and Palestinians.
The real issue is how the statement is defined. In general terms, supporters of Israeli policies take this rule to mean that no pressure should be brought upon Israel, as any such pressure is seen as undermining bilateral negotiations. Opponents of Israel’s occupation, on the other hand, tend to see outside pressure, in the form of international diplomacy or economic pressure, as crucial to incentivizing both sides into serious negotiations and toward making the difficult compromises necessary to achieve a final agreement. Read more at FMEP’s web site
Read Full Post »
Posted in Israel, Palestine, Peace Plans, United Nations, tagged 1967, Arab Peace Initiative, Armenian Genocide, Benjamin Netanyahu, Center for Constitutional Rights, Chemi Shalev, Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, CPPCG, David Ben-Gurion, Fatah, Gaza, Gaza Under Attack, Genocide, Ha'aretz, Hamas, Holocaust, Intent To Destroy, Labor Party, Mahmoud Abbas, Meretz, Michael Ratner, Native Americans, Oslo Accords, Oslo Peace Process, Palestinian Nationalism, Rwanda, UN General Assembly, Yitzhak Rabin, Zehava Gal-On on September 27, 2014 |
11 Comments »
Reaction to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ speech to the UN General Assembly today was swift and sharp. One of the most incisive
Mahmoud Abbas addresses the UN general Assembly, 9/26/14
Israeli columnists, Chemi Shalev of Ha’aretz, broke it down very well. He considered Abbas’ speech to be a welcome gift to the Israeli right. And I agree with him. But that’s not really the point.
Abbas has often used the UN podium as a way to be more direct and combative than he usually is regarding Israel, de-emphasizing the “partner for peace” charade and instead being more of an advocate for and leader of the Palestinian cause. But this time, he really turned up the heat. His reference to the attack on Gaza as “genocide” was calculated to play very well in Ramallah and Gaza City, and he willingly sacrificed the rest of the world’s approval. (more…)
Read Full Post »